<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Binary Data is XMPP&#8217;s Achilles Heel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/</link>
	<description>a blog about startups and code</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts On Scalable XMPP Bots &#171; metajack</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts On Scalable XMPP Bots &#171; metajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-252</guid>
		<description>[...] a large roster means an enormous stanza in the connection startup.  As I&#8217;ve written before, large stanzas are bad.  Pretty much all processing will stop for the bot while it receives and deals with this stanza.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a large roster means an enormous stanza in the connection startup.  As I&#8217;ve written before, large stanzas are bad.  Pretty much all processing will stop for the bot while it receives and deals with this stanza.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metajack</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>metajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-109</guid>
		<description>@peter: Wait until you see our new project!  I can tell you it mixes HTTP and XMPP quite nicely :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@peter: Wait until you see our new project!  I can tell you it mixes HTTP and XMPP quite nicely <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Saint-Andre</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Saint-Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Hmm, XMPP + HTTP would result in a kind of hybrid technology, and anything hybrid is red hot right now. I see some marketing possibilities... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, XMPP + HTTP would result in a kind of hybrid technology, and anything hybrid is red hot right now. I see some marketing possibilities&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metajack</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>metajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-107</guid>
		<description>@peter: Yes of course.  Perhaps I should have made this clearer in the article.  It was implied when I talked about large messages.  Hybrid use of HTTP works great as a workaround, but is a little cumbersome for many applications.  Also it requires a little finessing to work across server boundaries.  There would need to be a stream:features for telling clients where the HTTP service is for avatars for example.  So perhaps in addition to extending the XEPs for in-band bytestreams, we also should create an out of band HTTP service extension as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@peter: Yes of course.  Perhaps I should have made this clearer in the article.  It was implied when I talked about large messages.  Hybrid use of HTTP works great as a workaround, but is a little cumbersome for many applications.  Also it requires a little finessing to work across server boundaries.  There would need to be a stream:features for telling clients where the HTTP service is for avatars for example.  So perhaps in addition to extending the XEPs for in-band bytestreams, we also should create an out of band HTTP service extension as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Saint-Andre</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/binary-data-is-xmpps-achilles-heel/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Saint-Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-106</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just binary data, it&#039;s large data (some big SVG or DocBook file would cause just as many problems). And yes we need to figure this out, perhaps by encouraging more hybrid usage of XMPP and HTTP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just binary data, it&#8217;s large data (some big SVG or DocBook file would cause just as many problems). And yes we need to figure this out, perhaps by encouraging more hybrid usage of XMPP and HTTP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
