<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons To Love Django</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/</link>
	<description>a blog about startups and code</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hire A Developer, Not An Acronym &#171; metajack</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Hire A Developer, Not An Acronym &#171; metajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] A Developer, Not An&#160;Acronym 13Jun08    Yesterday I told the story of hiring a Django developer: Python is really easy to learn, and regardless of what you hear, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Developer, Not An&nbsp;Acronym 13Jun08    Yesterday I told the story of hiring a Django developer: Python is really easy to learn, and regardless of what you hear, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Beattie</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Beattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-165</guid>
		<description>#34 - Django was like, totally a kickass guitarist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#34 &#8211; Django was like, totally a kickass guitarist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alrex</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>alrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-164</guid>
		<description>&gt; Django is trivial to extend.

Perhaps easy to extend but not very flexible.
Try changing the ORM layer and let me know how that goes.

I personally believe that WSGI support should be better supported (currently looks like hack) and missing Aggregation support is a big one too. (I have many web apps that require some form of web reports, hence most land up being ugly custom queries.)

If I had those, I wouldn&#039;t need any more real flexibility that other frameworks may provide.

Seems that the WSGI (fix) and Aggregation are planed for 1.0 and 1.1 respectively. Looking forward to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Django is trivial to extend.</p>
<p>Perhaps easy to extend but not very flexible.<br />
Try changing the ORM layer and let me know how that goes.</p>
<p>I personally believe that WSGI support should be better supported (currently looks like hack) and missing Aggregation support is a big one too. (I have many web apps that require some form of web reports, hence most land up being ugly custom queries.)</p>
<p>If I had those, I wouldn&#8217;t need any more real flexibility that other frameworks may provide.</p>
<p>Seems that the WSGI (fix) and Aggregation are planed for 1.0 and 1.1 respectively. Looking forward to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Preece</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>David Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-160</guid>
		<description>phpimpact: &quot;How come the python community is not promoting this framework the same way Ruby developers are doing with Rails?&quot;

Because they have jobs to do. Stuff to ship. Clients to keep happy. Speaking of which...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phpimpact: &#8220;How come the python community is not promoting this framework the same way Ruby developers are doing with Rails?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because they have jobs to do. Stuff to ship. Clients to keep happy. Speaking of which&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metajack</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>metajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-157</guid>
		<description>@SuperJared: At least they now have a plan.  While it doesn&#039;t do an immediate release, is does do one at the beginning of July, with regularly scheduled releases to follow until September.

@phpimpact: I suspect the reason for the lack of promotion is that Rails/Ruby people have a dual job of promoting both the framework and the language.  In terms of popularity, Ruby is a newcomer (mostly because of Rails).  Python was already here and popular.  I am glad there is competition, even across languages.  It only means those of us who use frameworks will be spoiled for choice and can look forward to many new things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SuperJared: At least they now have a plan.  While it doesn&#8217;t do an immediate release, is does do one at the beginning of July, with regularly scheduled releases to follow until September.</p>
<p>@phpimpact: I suspect the reason for the lack of promotion is that Rails/Ruby people have a dual job of promoting both the framework and the language.  In terms of popularity, Ruby is a newcomer (mostly because of Rails).  Python was already here and popular.  I am glad there is competition, even across languages.  It only means those of us who use frameworks will be spoiled for choice and can look forward to many new things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phpimpact</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>phpimpact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-156</guid>
		<description>To be honest, the more I use Rails the more I like Django. Like you said, it provides everything you need by default. Although python doesn&#039;t have great documentation, the language is simple and very powerful. How come the python community is not promoting this framework the same way Ruby developers are doing with Rails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, the more I use Rails the more I like Django. Like you said, it provides everything you need by default. Although python doesn&#8217;t have great documentation, the language is simple and very powerful. How come the python community is not promoting this framework the same way Ruby developers are doing with Rails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperJared</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperJared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-154</guid>
		<description>If you ask me (and for the record you didn&#039;t) the version numbers are ridiculous. 0.95, 0.96 and trunk are all so different I could see them as major revision numbers if not entirely separate versions entirely.

Django&#039;s version numbering and release process confuse many new users. Finally getting to 1.0 will help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ask me (and for the record you didn&#8217;t) the version numbers are ridiculous. 0.95, 0.96 and trunk are all so different I could see them as major revision numbers if not entirely separate versions entirely.</p>
<p>Django&#8217;s version numbering and release process confuse many new users. Finally getting to 1.0 will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design company</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-153</guid>
		<description>#6: Because it was a ridiculous and great western movie with the best soundtrack ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6: Because it was a ridiculous and great western movie with the best soundtrack ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Problem With Django &#171; metajack</title>
		<link>http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/5-reasons-to-love-django/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>The Problem With Django &#171; metajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] 06/12: Please read the counterpart post as well: 5 Reasons To Love Django.    Filed under: code, django, python  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 06/12: Please read the counterpart post as well: 5 Reasons To Love Django.    Filed under: code, django, python  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
