http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/new-features-at-speeqe/ a blog about startups and code Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:41:49 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/new-features-at-speeqe/#comment-251 mm Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:39:09 +0000 http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-251 If you send a directed presence from client to the groupchat with nonzero priority, that should work right ? You should be getting messages from that jid ... while presence/message all others in roster would be not sent ... If you send a directed presence from client to the groupchat with nonzero priority, that should work right ?
You should be getting messages from that jid … while presence/message all others in roster would be not sent …

]]> http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/new-features-at-speeqe/#comment-250 metajack Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:31:55 +0000 http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-250 @dpc: I didn't say that was a bug, but we send directed presence (not with priority = -1) to a muc room, and we are not getting the presence of the participants back. It is being blocked. even though we sent directed available presence and should be received presence directed to our resource. What is the point of priority -1 if you can receive nothing? @dpc: I didn’t say that was a bug, but we send directed presence (not with priority = -1) to a muc room, and we are not getting the presence of the participants back. It is being blocked. even though we sent directed available presence and should be received presence directed to our resource. What is the point of priority -1 if you can receive nothing?

]]> http://metajack.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/new-features-at-speeqe/#comment-249 dpc Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:55 +0000 http://metajack.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-249 AFAIK not sending messages to resources with priority < 0 is not a bug. If you don't want to "steal" messages just send a 0 priority - the lowest priority that still gets messages. AFAIK not sending messages to resources with priority < 0 is not a bug. If you don’t want to “steal” messages just send a 0 priority – the lowest priority that still gets messages.

]]>